Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2017-05-15 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2017-05-15 House Journal Page 1423 HB 132 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the May 13 calendar (page 1383), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 132(L&C) "An Act relating to transportation network companies and transportation network company drivers; and providing for an effective date." Representative Kawasaki moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 132(L&C) be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Speaker stated that, without objection, CSHB 132(L&C) would be returned to second reading for all amendments. 2017-05-15 House Journal Page 1424 Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives Kawasaki, Josephson, Parish, Knopp, and Tuck: Page 13, line 26, through page 14, line 19: Delete all material. Renumber the following bill section accordingly. Representative Kawasaki moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Johnston objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 132(L&C) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Knopp, Ortiz, Parish, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Edgmon, Grenn, Johnson, Johnston, Kito, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Sullivan-Leonard, Thompson, Tilton, Westlake, Wilson, Wool Absent: Reinbold And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representatives Josephson, Kawasaki, Seaton, Parish, Knopp, and Tuck: Page 14, line 11: Delete "ratified by the voters in a regular municipal election" Representative Josephson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. 2017-05-15 House Journal Page 1425 Representative Birch objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 132(L&C) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 20 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Knopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake Nays: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Grenn, Johnson, Johnston, Kito, Kopp, LeDoux, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson, Wool And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. HB 132 CSHB 132(L&C) was before the House in second reading. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representatives Knopp, Kawasaki, Josephson, Parish, and Tuck: Page 13, lines 27 - 28: Delete "or drivers" Page 13, lines 30 - 31: Delete "or drivers" 2017-05-15 House Journal Page 1426 Page 13, line 31, through page 14, line 1: Delete "and transportation network company drivers" Page 14, lines 3 - 4: Delete "or transportation network company drivers" Page 14, lines 6 - 9: Delete "(1) imposition of a municipal sales tax on a transportation network company driver that taxes a trip originating in the municipality in the same manner that other services are taxed in the municipality; (2)" Page 14, lines 15 - 19: Delete all material and insert: "(e) In this section, "transportation network company" has the meaning given in AS 28.23.180." Representative Knopp moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Pruitt objected. Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representatives Knopp and Kawasaki: Delete "Page 14, lines 6 - 9: Delete "(1) imposition of a municipal sales tax on a transportation network company driver that taxes a trip originating in the municipality in the same manner that other services are taxed in the municipality; (2)"" Representative Knopp moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Wilson objected and withdrew the objection. There being no further objection, Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 3 was adopted. 2017-05-15 House Journal Page 1427 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 as amended be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 132(L&C) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 as amended YEAS: 21 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Guttenberg, Johnson, Josephson, Kawasaki, Knopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake Nays: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Grenn, Johnston, Kito, Kopp, LeDoux, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson, Wool And so, Amendment No. 3 as amended was adopted. CSHB 132(L&C) am was automatically in third reading. Representative Wool moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 132(L&C) am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of rescinding previous action in adopting Amendment No. 3 as amended. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Wool moved and asked unanimous consent that the House rescind previous action in adopting Amendment No. 3 as amended. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Millett placed a call of the House. The call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 as amended be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 132(L&C) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 as amended YEAS: 19 NAYS: 21 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 2017-05-15 House Journal Page 1428 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Knopp, Ortiz, Parish, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake Nays: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Grenn, Johnson, Johnston, Kito, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Neuman, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson, Wool And so, Amendment No. 3 as amended was not adopted. CSHB 132(L&C) was automatically in third reading. Representative Reinbold placed a call of the House. The call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall CSHB 132(L&C) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 132(L&C) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 35 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Drummond, Eastman, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Neuman, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Westlake, Wilson, Wool Nays: Claman, Fansler, Guttenberg, Knopp, Tuck And so, CSHB 132(L&C) passed the House. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 132(L&C) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.